Philosophy of Filmanalysis of filmTouch of Evil (Orson Welles, 1958) Movie Review

Philosophy of Filmanalysis of filmTouch of Evil (Orson Welles, 1958) - Movie Review ExampleFor example, there are obvious film noir characteristics, most notably in the visualization of shots. want shadows, angled lighting on characters, dingy settings, the suggestions of secrecy through mise-en-scene all testify to the film noir spirit. Moreover, the pivotal plot element of a murder (through barrage detonation) is consistent with the genre. While the cinematography is novel in this fashion, the core themes of the story are ancient and universal. Some critics have even identified Shakespearean themes in the film.European cinephiles, who were quick to enshrine Welles in a pantheon of auteurs, easily incorporated the Shakespeare films into the Wellesian cinema, recognizing in them themes and dramatic emphases present as well the destructive topic of power, even when employed in a just cause the inevitability of betrayal the loss of paradiseall of these films are, in their own way, S hakespearean texts, if in no other sense than in the way they impose a large, poetic intensity on questions of family and domesticity and thus wed the social with the personal. (Anderegg, 1999, p. 70)In coincidence to Shakespearean texts, one can see shades of Othello and Hamlet in the personages of Quinlan and Vargas. While envy was the undoing of Othello, misplaced pride and egoism were the root of Quinlans suffering. It is not an exaggeration to claim that the main focus of the film is personal anguish, which, of course, is illustrated through the framework of a crime thriller. Despite the heavy boozing and smoking, a murky past and question marks over professional integrity, Captain Quinlan can still be interpreted as a hero, for he ineluctably got the culprits convicted. His methods and means of achieving them are dubious, moreover the results were fair and just, even by his own evaluation. The famous intuitions of Quinlan may not arise from systematic or scientific analysis , but they nearly always happen to be right. Even the framing of Sanchez